Gavin Atkinson
2011-03-22 14:40:10 UTC
Hi,
declaration.
else if (actlen != xlen)
EHCI on nVidia - is it possible that this fixes any of them? Some of
the PRs date back to 6.x and 7.x - if I'm understanding the change
properly, it seems that it is possible that this could be the cause? Do
you have any opinions on whether this could fix any of those PRs?
Thanks,
Gavin
Date: Mon Mar 21 21:16:25 2011
New Revision: 219845
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219845
- Bugfix: Fix a EHCI hardware race, where the hardware computed data toggle
value is updated after that we read it in the queue-head. This patch can
fix problems with BULK timeouts. The issue was found on a Nvidia chipset.
head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c Mon Mar 21 21:16:12 2011 (r219844)
+++ head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c Mon Mar 21 21:16:25 2011 (r219845)
@@ -1180,6 +1180,26 @@ _ehci_remove_qh(ehci_qh_t *sqh, ehci_qh_
return (last);
}
+static void
+ehci_data_toggle_update(struct usb_xfer *xfer, uint16_t actlen, uint16_t xlen)
+{
+ uint8_t full = (actlen == xlen);
style(9) strongly advises against initialising variables in theNew Revision: 219845
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219845
- Bugfix: Fix a EHCI hardware race, where the hardware computed data toggle
value is updated after that we read it in the queue-head. This patch can
fix problems with BULK timeouts. The issue was found on a Nvidia chipset.
head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c Mon Mar 21 21:16:12 2011 (r219844)
+++ head/sys/dev/usb/controller/ehci.c Mon Mar 21 21:16:25 2011 (r219845)
@@ -1180,6 +1180,26 @@ _ehci_remove_qh(ehci_qh_t *sqh, ehci_qh_
return (last);
}
+static void
+ehci_data_toggle_update(struct usb_xfer *xfer, uint16_t actlen, uint16_t xlen)
+{
+ uint8_t full = (actlen == xlen);
declaration.
+ uint8_t dt;
+
+ /* count number of full packets */
+ dt = (actlen / xfer->max_packet_size) & 1;
+
+ /* cumpute remainder */
+ actlen = actlen % xfer->max_packet_size;
+
+ if (actlen > 0)
+ dt ^= 1; /* short packet at the end */
+ else if (!full)
Especially in this case - this would seem to be better written as+
+ /* count number of full packets */
+ dt = (actlen / xfer->max_packet_size) & 1;
+
+ /* cumpute remainder */
+ actlen = actlen % xfer->max_packet_size;
+
+ if (actlen > 0)
+ dt ^= 1; /* short packet at the end */
+ else if (!full)
else if (actlen != xlen)
+ dt ^= 1; /* zero length packet at the end */
+
+ xfer->endpoint->toggle_next ^= dt;
+}
As an aside, over the years there are several PRs about bulk timeouts on+
+ xfer->endpoint->toggle_next ^= dt;
+}
EHCI on nVidia - is it possible that this fixes any of them? Some of
the PRs date back to 6.x and 7.x - if I'm understanding the change
properly, it seems that it is possible that this could be the cause? Do
you have any opinions on whether this could fix any of those PRs?
Thanks,
Gavin
--
Gavin Atkinson
FreeBSD committer and bugmeister
GPG: A093262B (313A A79F 697D 3A5C 216A EDF5 935D EF44 A093 262B)
Gavin Atkinson
FreeBSD committer and bugmeister
GPG: A093262B (313A A79F 697D 3A5C 216A EDF5 935D EF44 A093 262B)